They're charming but destructive.

Mania's not healthy.

It's not, and binging is never good.

Trans fats are bad for your health.

Potato chips are not good for you.

Both are fairly bad for your health.

Head injuries are bad for you.

Head injuries are bad for you. They lead to Parkinson s disease.

He said E cigarettes are significantly less harmful than smoking.

Just as all carbs are not bad for you, all fats are not bad for you.

We learn again why closed networks are so harmful to us.

There is an economic explanation for why unions based on individual trades are detrimental.

How many people know that less than one percent of microorganisms make us sick?

There's not one week that goes without some major headlines in the media about whether video games are good or bad for you, right? You're all bombarded with that.

And yet they worship besides God what cannot bring them gain or do them harm.

And yet, instead of God, they serve what neither profits them nor harms them.

Yet they worship instead of Allah that which can neither benefit them nor hurt them.

The problem is that at least some electromagnetic waves are dangerous.

Just as all carbs are not bad for you, all fats are not bad for you. There are good fats.

I not only do not require schools, but they would even do me harm, as I have already told you.

Even positive stereotypes are bad for women, men, and effective leadership.

So you have less waste, and the waste that you have is not as environmental malign as it is with cow dung.

Such operators make up for the shortfall in the publicly operated system and are a positive new element in many cities' public transport systems, as they can run more frequently and are particularly popular in the evenings.

Sviyazhsky began talking about Levin and mentioned his peculiar view that machines only did harm in Russian agriculture.

And they worship such, other than Allah, which neither benefit nor hurt them and the disbeliever helps the devil instead of his Lord.

And they serve, apart from God, what neither profits them nor hurts them and the unbeliever is ever a partisan against his Lord.

And yet they worship, besides Allah, that which can neither benefit them nor hurt them and the infidel is ever an aider of the devil against his Lord.

And they (disbelievers, polytheists, etc.) worship besides Allah, that which can neither profit them nor harm them, and the disbeliever is ever a helper (of the Satan) against his Lord.

Yet they worship, instead of Allah, those who can neither benefit them nor harm them more than this, the disbeliever has become a helper of every rebel against his Lord.

People need to know the harm that institutions cause to children, and the better alternatives that exist.

So the key is to choose the right rituals, the ones that are not harmful but rituals by themselves are not to be dismissed.

Traffic congestion, in particular, is not only environmentally detrimental it also imposes substantial time and resource costs on drivers.

If people only knew how unhealthy it is to to listen to people's talk people wouldn't bother to listen, and they would be ever so much healthier.

That would without doubt represent a structural change for the Security Council that would be very harmful to our collective security system.

And the question is well, if we're around here, you know, these little losses or gains might not be too bad.

The food itself will kill those pesky critters stone cold dead!

Now, some people think that pesticides made by big biotechs are harmful for humans, animals and the environment. But, that's OK!

No child may be employed in work hazardous to health or that might endanger his or her physical, mental or moral development.

It is not permitted to employ children to perform work that is hazardous to health or injurious to their physical, mental or moral development.

Can anyone explain to me why we spend millions and millions of dollars on educating about drug prevention, don't take drugs because they're bad for you.

Another Nobel laureate, Paul Krugman, has claimed that macroeconomics over the last three decades has been useless at best and harmful at worst.

As consumers, we have the power and the moral obligation to refuse to support farming methods that are cruel to animals and bad for us.

The statements are said to have been highly prejudicial to the author apos s case, in that they purportedly contained identification evidence and evidence that conflicted with the ballistic evidence.

Some would say that large and complex agriculture communities that can support cities, and eventually inexpensive meat sandwiches, are not necessarily beneficial to the planet, or even to its human inhabitants.

So we're sort of all imperfect. And the question is well, if we're around here, you know, these little losses or gains might not be too bad.