Everyone benefits.

I think they'll win.

I'm sure they'll win.

I'm sure they'll win.

Do you think Tom and Mary are going to win?

Do you think Tom and Mary are going to win?

I don't expect them to win.

Neither Tom nor Mary will win.

If successful, it's a win win situation.

Developing countries stand to gain the most from improving trade facilitation.

If Tom and Mary win, I'll be happy.

They can only win if they all pull together as a team.

Now the only ones I really like are the Italian sisters, but they won't win.

As things stand now, the right is likely to win the first round, but with less than 50 .

That is to say, large producers from other countries will be the biggest winners of the import ban , says Akimov.

Saying no to bad food will benefit the economy and the happiness index of the country.

Small entrepreneurs believe that they will not benefit from tax reforms.

In other words, they would benefit from the publicly financed programs that the Tea Party s sponsors wish to abolish.

In the end, those gambling in Las Vegas lose more than they gain. As a society, we are gambling with our big banks, with our nuclear power facilities, with our planet.

Both rich and poor countries would benefit from increased migration, with developing countries benefiting the most.

Nevertheless, many water uses would respond well to more efficient prices. 160

In the end, those gambling in Las Vegas lose more than they gain.

It is on the way to a US style capital market where households hold funds and companies issue paper and stocks, intermediation margins are small and governance significant. European companies will benefit from the transformation, the most significant supply side influence we will see.

European companies will benefit from the transformation, the most significant supply side influence we will see.

As with any compromise, the contending parties would both gain and lose from this arrangement. Serbia would save face, and would continue to have a say on crucial matters concerning Kosovo, including the treatment of the Serbian minority.

As with any compromise, the contending parties would both gain and lose from this arrangement.

Of course, there would be some big gainers from agricultural reform, but they are chiefly consumers and taxpayers in rich countries. Some large middle income food exporters (such as Brazil and Argentina) would also reap gains.

Of course, there would be some big gainers from agricultural reform, but they are chiefly consumers and taxpayers in rich countries.

Only when all citizens benefit from economic development can leaders devoted to poverty reduction claim genuine success.

One hopes that those who understand the economics of debt and austerity, and who believe in democracy and humane values, will prevail.

Broadly speaking, companies that do the majority of their business in the U.S. will win as interest rates rise and local products become more attractive.

The economist David Ricardo pointed out in 1817 that both Great Britain and Portugal would benefit if they exploited their comparative advantages.

On the right, support for conservative parties is split between business interests that benefit from immigration or supranational institutions, and groups that feel threatened by them.

His response to the plight of the Yezidis in Iraq has been both cerebral and visceral, and both America and the world are better for it.

Lowering trade barriers would mean that all countries could focus on doing what they do best, making everyone better off.

There is a great danger that the new Iraq s sectarian politics will benefit those who promise their constituents the most at the expense of the central government and the country s other factions.

Too big to fail banks have perverse incentives if they gamble and win, they walk off with the proceeds if they fail, taxpayers pick up the tab.

It would give developing nations a strong incentive to accept mandatory quotas, because if they can keep their per capita emissions low, they will have excess emissions rights to sell to the industrialized nations. The rich countries will benefit, too, because they will be able to choose their preferred mix of reducing emissions and buying up emissions rights from developing nations.

The rich countries will benefit, too, because they will be able to choose their preferred mix of reducing emissions and buying up emissions rights from developing nations.

Our second message was optimistic if the agenda of the current round is reoriented towards development, and if assistance is provided to manage implementation and adjustment costs, developing countries can gain much.

The official response to this is that no country should be forced to increase wages, and that everybody gains if structural reforms increase productivity.

Moreover, pension funds, retirement plans, and non profit organizations, which receive about 50 of all corporate dividends, do not pay tax on these earnings, and would benefit from a lower corporate tax rate.

In the long term, the US will gain nothing and risk much by continuing to back oil sheikhdoms that fund Muslim extremist groups and madrasas from the Philippines and India to South Africa and Venezuela.

It is equally important, however, to understand the variety in outcomes for the poor, so as to understand better what else must be done to assure more growth that directly benefits them.

For example, electricity workers would realize that, as consumers, their gains from lower prices throughout the economy more than compensate them for the loss of rents in their own firms.