Tom is afraid of getting fired.

I want him fired.

There is no reason why he should be dismissed.

Tell me the reason why he was fired.

I can get you fired.

Politics and Corporate Money

Corporate Crimes and Punishments

The one who deserves to be fired is Tom.

Tell me the reason why Tom was fired.

At the F.I.S.T.

Corporate earnings in the first quarter improved sharply.

You had options other than sacking him. Hugh Riminton ( hughriminton) April 26, 2015

Bagaimana perusahaan ini akan menyesuaikan kebijakan korporasi dengan kebutuhan planet?

Manufacturing Workers 24 Months after Layoff in the EU15

The Ukraine, corporate media, hibernating in the river mud until the next cycle.

The corporate interests at stake in the Free Basics program are difficult to ignore.

When deciding whether to lay off a worker, a firm should take into account the social costs of doing so.

Support Workers' Union Will Sue City Over Layoffs

Neoliberals attacked the expense of entitlement programs and the vested interests of trade unions.

The corporate origin of universities is of more than historical interest here.

But, as capital becomes more mobile, relatively immobile workers are bearing more of the burden in the form of lower wages and fewer job opportunities.

That is why countries around the world have been cutting their corporate tax rates.

NY nanny sues couple over firing after racist text

The lawsuit is possibly the last weapon available to the union, District Council 37, in its effort to reverse the layoffs.

Corporate profits are bursting at the seams of investors expectations in virtually every corner of the world.

Soaring oil prices will cut corporate profits and household purchasing power.

The hope is that lower corporate taxes will stimulate investment.

When this took off in January 1998, the labor unions did accept the inevitability of layoffs.

Frankly, sticking to the public record, the two resignations seem like night and day.

Internally, mandatory retirements will soon cost the Agency 50 of its senior management.

Unsurprisingly, rules that make it difficult to fire established workers discourage employers from hiring new ones.

As mass layoffs became reality, the radical Korean Confederation of Trade Unions withdrew from the commission.

When politicians can emancipate themselves from corporate donations, they will regain the ability to control corporate abuses.

Kornev noted that the failure to meet delivery deadlines for the projects could be both a pretext and the reason for the dismissal.

Corporate managers are blamed for seeking short term and personal profit, not social prosperity.

The result is a culture of impunity, based on the well proven expectation that corporate crime pays.

Corporate employers are even complaining about not being able to attract overseas talent.

As a result, bringing down yields on government, corporate, and asset backed bonds has less impact.

Moreover, in the United States, for example, private donations far exceed corporate philanthropy.

After resuming control of Apple in 1997, Jobs initially eliminated all corporate philanthropy programs.

The limitation of this approach, however, is that a free market for labor will neither eradicate unemployment nor transform marginal, low end workers into high productivity, high wage employees.

Allow employers to fire workers more easily, they argue, and employers will hire them more readily.

But corporate villains, typically multinational companies, have never been so ubiquitous as today.

Manufacturing production has plummeted, the trade balance has deteriorated sharply, and corporate bankruptcies are increasingly frequent.

High tax rates on labor together with rigid regulation of hiring and firing make employers extremely reluctant to recruit workers.