They will come to know soon.

Certainly they will soon know!

They will come to know.

They shall soon come to know.

But they will come to know.

Now, what s wrong with shape is summarized in this slide.

Now, what's wrong with shape is summarized in this slide.

The fallacy of this approach lies in the Muslim Brotherhood s nature.

Seventy years ago, John Maynard Keynes pointed out its fallacy.

Has Keynesian economics been proven wrong now that it has been put to the test?

If his interpretation was wrong, he hoped that the Office of Legal Affairs would correct him.

Those who ascribe another God along with Allah so they will soon come to know.

Who set up along with Allah anot her god presently they shall know.

Who set up along with Allah another ilah (god), they will come to know.

UNICEF, while playing its part, has had to dispel this notion on numerous occasions.

So far, that has not happened and, China once again seems to have gone its own way and proved the experts wrong.

This assumption proved incorrect once the world became polarized during the prolonged cold war.

Though the origin of this myth is cloudy, science has proven its falsity, and a globalized world has rendered it anachronistic.

It is high time that the IMF approach its mission scientifically and recognize that it is on the wrong track in Argentina.

The fallacy of this approach has been seen in many and varied instances, ranging from corruption within the body politic, to totalitarianism at the national level, to trans boundary crime and terrorism at the international level.

It was to be hoped that, as in the case of Somalia, the Security Council would recognize the error of its position, which was injuring the Muslim population of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

To demonstrate that it is wrong to associate Islam with terrorism, the OIC might begin to compile statistics on the religious affiliations of those who engage in terrorism.

Lo! ye are those who love them though they love you not, and ye believe in all the Scripture.

That approach, based on the costly illusion that markets could in some sense be directed or steered, had proved incorrect and had been abandoned.

They consider their rabbis and monks and the Christ, son of Mary, to be gods apart from God, even though they had been enjoined to worship only one God, for there is no god but He.

Events proved them wrong not only did the risks exist, but their consequences were so enormous that they easily erased all the supposed benefits of the systems that industry leaders promoted.

Interactive Cognitive Scenario only suggests the possibility of alternative actions of each team member (using branching) in combination with the possibility of subsequent rejection from them when it becomes clear for team that these actions were erroneous (using selection).

This is the recompense of those who do good.

So because of their saying, Allah bestowed them with Gardens beneath which rivers flow, in which they will abide forever and this is the reward of the virtuous.

And God rewards them for what they say with gardens underneath which rivers flow, therein dwelling forever that is the recompense of the good doers.

Wherefore Allah will reward them, for that which they said, with Gardens whereunder rivers flow as abiders therein such is the recompense of the well doers.

Such is the reward of good doers.

Such is the reward of the righteous.

Such is the reward of the people who do good.

That is the reward of the good.

In defense I wish to cite the great Harvard philosopher John Rawls, who died recently. Theory, no matter how elegant, Rawls argued, should be dismissed or revised when proven untrue.