We're standing.

We have a moral challenge in this moment.

We're about to take a break in a moment.

We are faced with a difficult choice.

Why, then, did the American aircraft strike them?

We're on the verge of another catastrophe.

And now we are back to reality.

That is what we are up against.

You stand with your bike at the beginning of February.

Build a nice home, bring the architect, design my house.

We stand on the threshold of a new multilateralism.

NT We are at the dawn of a new age, the age of electricity.

We know our rights and we are standing up to claim them.its just the begining.

We are totally naked, standing still while he inspects.

We are now on the threshold of another the age of green economics.

We've been standing here for more than an hour and the line has barely moved.

In essence, then, we are confronted by a three pronged challenge of a new green industrial revolution.

We now stand at the threshold of a new phase of European cooperation.

On the contrary, as in 1989, we are faced with the urgent need for change and responsible leadership.

And one last slide I just want to show. This is the choice You can either have wind or nuclear.

Now I think we're at the beginnings of a great debate regarding the personal dimension of human life.

By principle we don't do that. we don't know yet how it will end for us, but we're standing

'But we are defending a principle, an ideal!' said Pestsov in his sonorous bass. 'Women wish to have the right to be independent and educated.

As we stand at the brink of war, it is urgent that the hard job of making globalization work for all gets started.

So, the question we now face is this how important will the technological revolutions in data processing and communications be in the long run?

It's very cold, and you're standing in one of these rainy days, and it's drizzling and cold and chilly, and you're standing in, let's say, Yokneam.

We are standing above the new Sorek desalination plant, the largest reverse osmosis desal facility in the world, and we are staring at Israel s salvation.

As in 1995, resolve and transatlantic unity are needed if we are not to sleepwalk into another crisis.

At the same time, we are on the threshold of a new era when the Lisbon Treaty enters into force and provides fresh impetus for our external action.

Even as we stand here tonight, we know there are brave Americans waking up in the deserts of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, to risk their lives for us.

The Cold War s end, twenty years ago this autumn, was supposed to provide a peace dividend. Instead, we find ourselves still facing serious nuclear threats. Some stem from the persistence of more than 20,000 nuclear weapons and the contagious doctrine of nuclear deterrence. Others relate to nuclear tests more than a dozen in the post Cold War era, aggravated by the constant testing of long range missiles.

Indeed, as we face today s security challenges terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, failed states we cannot afford not to.

Disengaging now will not leave people free from our interference it will put them at the mercy of groups whose extremism threatens the very way of life that we stand for and to which they aspire.

And so if language really is the solution to the crisis of visual theft, if language really is the conduit of our cooperation, the technology that our species derived to promote the free flow and exchange of ideas, in our modern world, we confront a question.