Autonomy, mastery and purpose, versus carrot and sticks. And who wins?

Autonomy, mastery and purpose, versus carrot and sticks, and who wins?

Until recently, this combination of carrots and sticks functioned effectively.

And the 80 percent zone is a no carrot and no stick zone.

And the 80 percent zone is a no carrot and no stick zone.

Sticks as well as carrots have been used by both sides to maintain this alliance.

But reintegration will require a carrot and stick approach.

In other words, Europe s carrots are not enough a successful outcome requires American carrots, too.

In resolutions 1572 (2004) and 1584 (2005) the Council has provided measures employing both carrots and sticks.

Hard power works through payments and coercion (carrots and sticks) soft power works through attraction and co option.

Diplomacy needs to be well resourced, and apply the right mix of incentives and pressures on leaders and followers.

In such cases, America can step in and, by using both carrot and stick, make both sides go the extra mile.

Formulating the right mix of carrots and sticks is extremely difficult, and the US is hardly seen in the region as an honest broker.

They ought to be persuaded through a judicious mixture of carrots and sticks that strengthening the rule of law and democratic institutions would work to their advantage.

In Russia the stick has always worked better than the carrot all the latter has been able to produce is more lawlessness and that's why we have all this rampant corruption!

Not surprisingly, this all carrot, no stick approach has failed to affect North Korean behavior.

The trouble with this carrot and stick strategy is not that it is wrong but that it is insufficient.

But for 21st century tasks, that mechanistic, reward and punishment approach doesn't work, often doesn't work, and often does harm.

The quot carrot and stick quot approach behind the last peace initiative should be considered with extra caution.

Diplomacy needs to be well resourced, sustained, and apply the right mix of incentives and pressures on leaders and followers.

Although the Party s carrot and stick approach has worked since 1989, it is doubtful that it will retain its efficacy for another 17 years.

Instead of engaging in preemptive military actions, the US should pursue preventive actions of a constructive nature, creating a better balance between carrots and sticks in the prevailing world order.

Western analysts and activists should have learned by now that and military threats produce only resistance, and that genuine diplomacy involves using carrots as well as sticks. Yet the emerging policy consensus contains no positive incentives to resolve the Darfur crisis.

Western analysts and activists should have learned by now that and military threats produce only resistance, and that genuine diplomacy involves using carrots as well as sticks.

However, for a Serbian mind, conditioned to constant appeasement, the carrot and stick approach with no stick only encourages further intransigence.

The Government had fought a lone battle against the group, calling in vain for dialogue, and had been obliged to have recourse to a carrot and stick policy, using both strength and diplomacy.

Trade may be used as either a carrot or a stick to persuade other countries to reduce pollution at source.

In light of projected losses, the Nepali government has sought to attract foreigners back with a mixture of the carrot and stick, by slashing the price of climbing in the first part of 2015 but also targeting tourists with fines if they do not return with their rubbish.

It now uses a broad range of hard and soft power, some incommensurate to that of the EU for instance, the military bases that it has managed to secure in each of the six states.

Uribe s carrot and stick policy to the guerrillas combined democratic security under the rule of law and respect for human rights with the popular slogan Long live Colombia and travel through her.

I think the environmental movement has failed in that it's used the stick too much it's used the apocalyptic tone too much it hasn't sold the positive aspects of being environmentally concerned and trying to pull us out.

You can do it with threats of coercion, sticks, you can do it with payments, carrots, or you can do it by getting others to want what you want.

In any event, the use of trade measures as a carrot stick as part of a package of measures to get international agreements on any issue, environment or other, is a controversial matter.

and cinnamon, incense, perfume, frankincense, wine, olive oil, fine flour, wheat, sheep, horses, chariots, and people's bodies and souls.

And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.

One, and two, and three, and four, and five, and six, and seven, and...

Ataroth, and Dibon, and Jazer, and Nimrah, and Heshbon, and Elealeh, and Sebam, and Nebo, and Beon,

Ataroth, and Dibon, and Jazer, and Nimrah, and Heshbon, and Elealeh, and Shebam, and Nebo, and Beon,

58 lt br gt 00 05 05,185 amp gt 00 05 06,384 lt br gt And and and time!

68 lt br gt 00 05 34,114 amp gt 00 05 35,291 lt br gt And and and time!

the hart, and the gazelle, and the roebuck, and the wild goat, and the ibex, and the antelope, and the chamois.

The hart, and the roebuck, and the fallow deer, and the wild goat, and the pygarg, and the wild ox, and the chamois.

Thanks and praises and praises, and wash and shower, and hosts, and head.

and Ibhar, and Elishua, and Nepheg, and Japhia,

Parmashta, Arisai, Aridai, and Vaizatha,