The war changed that equation.

Assessment of risk

There's no risk.

Whether or not it can connect with regional ironies.

The first is exchange rate relationships.

States of Risk

In Africa, the ratio is 900 per 100,000.

In the US, that ratio has remained relatively constant.

The Risky Rich

There's absolutely no risk.

There's absolutely no risk.

Everybody's at risk.

What's the student teacher ratio at your school?

Risk talking is valued, not shunned.

This was not without risk.

This strategy is not without risk.

A constant debt GDP ratio is thus a key indicator of fiscal sustainability.

This is the ratio of optometrists to people in sub Saharan Africa.

Now, it is less than one in four.

This is anything but a risk free path.

Accounting for systemic risk has several implications.

Now there are several biases in risk perception.

But pollution is the king of all risk factors.

Age The age of the mother is a significant risk factor.

Most developed countries have a growing number and proportion of elderly.

In fact, the ratio of federal to national votes in the ECB is 1 2.5.

The ratio of the better off to poor is about nine to one.

The debt GDP ratio was expected to top out at 150 absent the substantial write down of privately held debt, which was deemed unnecessary, the ratio would have been close to 250 .

So, if you sort of compare that, like this, you'll see that computer versus human I've been tracking this for the last year computer versus human over the last year has changed.

It is simply a precaution against future risks.

And it has implications for systemic risk.

Never mind moral hazard problems or insolvency.

The struggle for water in Iquitos is not without risks.

Moreover, there must be greater balance between capital intensive and labor intensive activities.

For comparison's sake, the ratio in the United States is one doctor for every 413 people.

, the gender distribution of the population was 47.8 male and 52.2 female.

In 2007, the mortgage and consumer debt to GDP ratio was more than 90 , compared to 24 for net foreign debt.

(a) The degree of risk of significant transboundary harm and of the availability of means of preventing such harm, or minimizing the risk thereof or repairing the harm

There is currently no such risk in Europe.

Compared with other drugs with the same indications, new drugs should be selected on the basis of their safety, effectiveness, and cost.

People are a little risk averse. So what?

And of course risk. I think architecture should be risky.

SENDAI Current disaster risk levels are alarming.

Ideally, drugs should have a favorable risk benefit ratio.

Article 11 Situations of risk and humanitarian emergencies