The government response

The ECB s stance is peculiar.

This is dangerous territory.

This is wrong.

The US position was a travesty.

That is an unconvincing stance.

Such double talk is misguided.

This is woefully short sighted.

Position x and y

Tom was shocked by Mary's attitude.

I like Tom's attitude.

One high ranking policymaker noted in mid July, This is truly shocking We understand politics, but your government s continued recklessness is astonishing.

It is my solid citizenship.

Parkhomenko s account of what happened in Kolpashevo is not without its detractors.

Mr. Monirul Islam, another high police official, said

Ahmadinejad is not the first high ranking official in Iran to challenge the supreme leader.

That is an odd position to take, to say the least.

By contrast, the national kleptocrats position is more consistent.

As a result, Netanyahu s position is strong.

Yanukovich s anti democratic position should come as no surprise.

Yanukovych s anti democratic position should come as no surprise.

Come, there is a position in the Environmental Bureau.

A top official said the government will review these schools dance routines from a moral perspective.

Their position goes beyond political philosophy.

Yet this stance has become untenable.

Do you have tenure?

It's not in my stance, but in his.

This position can be explained as follows

Now that position has been bluntly and uncompromisingly expressed.

In the meantime, a somewhat conservative and defensive posture is warranted.

This is a very nice position, but not entirely correct.

Obama's actual position on the issue was more nuanced.

Our position is based on justice and international law.

The official stance on the commenter role's value is quite the opposite.

Very good stance, except the bit about extremist ones .

The rationale for the law is the polar opposite (of who the law will affect).

He had a strong stance on the subject.

As a senior Asian statesman told me recently, Deng would never have made this mistake.

On this September 26 the newspaper Vedomosti citing a senior source in the ruling party.

Indeed, when asked by Bush to look into the matter, America's National Academy of Sciences came to a resounding verdict (the only one they could honestly reach) that greenhouse gases are a menace.

When should this stance change if not now?

Putin s position on global warming would be less ambivalent.

This stance conveniently avoided rows with oil dictators. Moreover, provided they were not too troublesome politically over Israel, they could earn a well paid seat at our table.

So the president's position is clear and he will not back down.

Korea s relatively low ranking reflects the inclusion of North Korea.