I'll do a video on why sometimes a coefficient of static friction can be different than the coefficient of kinetic friction

So we can say this generally coefficient of kinetic friction is less than or equal to the coefficient of static friction

These are the same surfaces is why should the coefficient of friction here why should the coefficient of static friction so this is here, this is stationary what's under place of coefficient of static friction why should that be larger than the coefficient of kinetic friction over here?

you could figure out this coefficient of kinetic friction

So given this, let's calculate another coefficient of friction but this is going to be the coefficient of kinetic friction because now we're moving down the block.

And the interesting thing here is that the coefficient the way I've set up this problem the coefficient of kinetic friction is lower, if we assume the same materials than the coefficient of static friction

It's not this cut and dry thing so fun thing to think about what's happening in the atomic level but this is the general intuition of why the coefficient of static friction is higher than the coefficient of kinetic friction

So the coefficient of kinetic friction, we'll write it as the Greek letter mu with a little k here for kinetic where it's a kind of moving friction

49 times the square root of 3 gives us a coefficient of static friction of, if we round it, 0.59.

So given this right here, let's figure out for the sake of doing it the coefficient of kinetic friction here

We were trying to determine the coefficient of static friction and it's 50 Newtons divided by 49 square roots of 3 Newtons.

Calculation of coefficient

Coefficient.

Friction

Friction

Gini coefficient

Real coefficient

Imaginary coefficient

And now, instead of making the coefficient larger, let's make the coefficient less.

No friction.

cdr a coefficient of 0.45

cdr a coefficient of 0,45

By the inverse of the coefficient.

3 The Gini coefficient (coefficient of income concentration) makes it possible to numerically assess the degree of inequality.

It reduce the friction.

And then the coefficient on the x squared term is 1. The coefficient is 1.

The coefficient here is 11.

The new train's derail coefficient is 0.34 at a speed of while the maximum derail coefficient of the CRH2A is 0.73.

There's the AC, the coefficient of this first term, there's AD BC, the coefficient of this middle term, and there's BD.

The function μ is referred to as the drift coefficient, while σ is called the diffusion coefficient.

(o) Partition coefficient n octanol water

(o) Partition coefficient n octanol water

One should have the lowest coefficient.

What Kasparov calls process is a byproduct of friction.

This right over here is the force of friction

Friction causes a match to light.

We love the contrast, the friction...

Do they do it by friction?

The leading coefficient here, the coefficient on the highest degree term in standard form it's already in standard form

Friction or no friction, OPEC has been, and will always be, irrelevant to market forces on the ground.

The coefficient (1.4552210935) calculation is shown below.

3 is the coefficient on the x.

And then we immediately know the coefficient.

Now I just used the word coefficient.

Friction climbing doesn't have any sort of hard positive edges.