And somehow it will all make sense.

Even in those circumstances, war might well have been unwise compared to a policy of containment.

Still, the war would then at least make some sense.

In linguistics, a word sense is one of the meanings of a word.

This won't have any consequences.

What may make sense in the vast open reaches of Texas will not necessarily work in rural France or Britain.

The lack of formatting makes it incredibly difficult to read and I am sure it will make no sense whatsoever to whoever reads it there.

Of what use is genetic information about a disease when there are no therapeutic options?

Continuation of these actions will have consequences.

It will, and it should.

So, complete transparency will make a huge difference.

A united approach will be crucial.

Liquor will have an effect on a person.

Such an approach might make tactical diplomatic sense, as long as there is no background clatter.

There is a need for substantive engagement, so that a leaders meeting makes sense.

The point, most of us. What's the point?

Such a measure would have several positive effects.

Possessing the wealth, he will have resources for expenditure.

But how much will it matter?

Truth uncompromisingly told will always have its jagged edges.

Would the European Council have a diverse set of memberships?

That will have ramifications in the post authoritarian context.

It will only have prospective jurisdiction.

Maybe that will be the case again.

I didn't think it would matter.

Maybe it won't make any difference.

Everything you have will have you someday.

Second, the costs of abandoning diplomacy are so high that continued engagement makes sense even as Iran refuses to budge.

Does it matter if Europe is not on the same page as the US?

In applications where higher performance is an issue, it can make sense to expend more effort to deal with a more complex, non linear storage organization.

Nevertheless, internal policies will be of grave importance.

A military strike would likely have worse consequences.

To have everything. If we miss something, it collapses.

Indeed, the duration the agreement will be of vital importance.

For countries in the Caribbean, a shrunken UK has several consequences.

It will have 10 stations within Incheon.

The trip will have the same length but we will be four instead of five.

Delaying entry into EMU could make sense if a longer wait produced more information. But a wait of greater length might produce nothing but added noise.

The implication is clear.

What's the point?

What is the point?

When will be the turning point, when will the virtual election have its real life consequences?

First, tighter sanctions make sense only as a diplomatic tool, not as a blunt instrument of coercion. The new sanctions simply are not severe enough to intimidate Iran into submission, and more restrictive ones would not pass muster within the Security Council.

First, tighter sanctions make sense only as a diplomatic tool, not as a blunt instrument of coercion.

For the citizens of Francophone Africa, this will certainly have tragic consequences.