And then you make some assumptions about it.

Many of the reactions to my book tend to confirm that belief.

Another netizen put his assumption that the woman was at fault in mathematical terms

This is wrong.

Your hypothesis is correct.

Your hypothesis is correct.

That's my theory.

Was that a guess?

It's just a guess.

That's just speculation.

That assumption is wrong.

That's just a guess.

It's only a guess.

The second assumption which informs the American view of choice goes something like this.

That was a good guess.

This assumption is patently false.

It was only a hypothesis.

That's a supposition, not a fact.

But that is merely another erroneous (not to mention amoral) assumption.

Still, the war would then at least make some sense. The horrors of a senseless war are almost too frightening to contemplate.

The horrors of a senseless war are almost too frightening to contemplate.

The optimal combination of solutions will create the biggest impact for the least money.

This surge in business spending boosted overall demand.

Less certain, however, is the premise that the world order would collapse without American leadership.

This assumption is not so far fetched.

This exonerating hypothesis does not hold water.

I can personally disprove this premise.

Do you have a theory?

However, that was just my conjecture.

Malicious observers suggest that she is to blame for pursuing populist social expenditures.

This was always bad history.

That is the premise of this particular presentation.

But the assumption behind why these agents hold tech tea parties in Qatar is just plain wrong.

The Pacific Alliance is supposed to allow the movement of people but in practice this is not the case.

History The existence of a continuous stream of particles flowing outward from the Sun was first suggested by British astronomer Richard C. Carrington.

But there were other policies that would have provided far more stimulus at far less cost.

Clay Shirky, that great chronicler of everything networked, has captured the assumption that this challenges in such a beautiful way.

Independent Russian economic experts are unanimous in sharing this grim conclusion.

Here is the premise that I began 27 years ago.

So what scientists do is they have a hypothesis that they think might be likely to start with.

You ought to think over whether the premise is valid or not.

How much confidence exists that this assumption is correct?

But Mr Hare rejected the suggestion the YMCA had a cultural problem which prevented staff from reporting Lord's breaches of child safety.

And they didn't really raise their hands, but they took me out to dinner and showed me what they could do with expense reports.

How do you provide medically relevant information at as close as possible to zero cost? How do you do it?