The use of military force would not provide a lasting solution.

In countering terrorism, the use of conventional military force alone is insufficient.

The extent to which use of force is permitted to achieve the above described military purpose is thus limited by IHL.

E. Use of force

Excessive use of force 6 5 1 12

The use of force and sanctions

Disproportionate exercise of police powers

(c) Excessive use of force

A heinous crime, A show of force

Yet, it remains controversial because it is often assumed that it implies the use of military force for purposes of humanitarian intervention.

We have to reduce the use of force.

The use of force in psychiatric treatment

Moreover, South Ossetians have Russian nationality only because Russia recently bestowed it on them unilaterally. Finally, the 1992 agreement authorizes only monitoring of internal tensions, not massive use of military force.

Finally, the 1992 agreement authorizes only monitoring of internal tensions, not massive use of military force.

As the efficacy of military power is reduced, so the importance of economic power grows.

Jurisdictions report to the Senior Officers' Group and Australasian Police Ministers' Council (APMC) each year.

It has become clear that violence against the Kashmiri people, and the use of military force will achieve nothing but the further deterioration of the situation in Kashmir.

Instead, the use of force is taking new forms.

First, resorting to force is simply not realistic.

Use of force under the Charter of the United Nations

Excessive use of force 2 2 9 13

(c) Excessive use of force . 55 57 17

When the exercise of hard power undercuts soft power, it makes leadership more difficult as Bush found out after the invasion of Iraq.

On many of today's key issues, such as international financial stability, drug smuggling, the spread of diseases, or global climate change, military power is ineffective.

The massive military response by the Government, aside from taking a tremendous toll on the civilian population, will succeed only in deepening the resentment.

India, too, is now joining the military build up.

Violence ensued, which led to the death of two farmers.

quot The use of force alone is but temporary.

Violence has declined dramatically over the last 500 years.

In other words, a state monopoly that has the use of violence well under control.

What is needed is to find a less belligerent, more liberal way to promote democracy, stressing international cooperation instead of blunt military force.

Thirdly, the use of military force cannot be an end in itself.

Recent American leaders, for their part, find it nearly impossible to deploy military force without first employing such rhetoric as both mantra and crutch. The most famous example came in 1917.

The use of force has never solved these problems, he added.

The unilateral use of force can never be justified in any case.

There have always been attempts in Latin America to justify the use of force.

The use of force or intimidation is also regarded as tantamount to torture.

The use of defoliants during the military campaign has damaged much of the country apos s vegetation.

This leads to a larger point about the role of military force.

This leads to a larger point about the role of military force in world politics.

The war was meant to demonstrate the strategic power of military might.

UN Secretary General is against using military force to resolve the Syrian conflict.

Experience had shown that military force alone would not suppress terrorism.

If there is no other way to stop the thieves, the use of force is necessary.

The immediate concern is localized, typically small scale resort to force.