Neither side will concede.

A simple majority is no longer enough to get anything even routine business passed through the Senate. (Applause.) Neither party has been blameless in these tactics.

A divorce would be permitted, if one of the parties

Neither side is interested in escalation or a breakdown.

Neither side can talk its way out of this predicament.

There is no glory on either side of the Israel Palestine debacle.

Officially, none of the parties has yet commented on this information.

No party must impose its will on another.

Neither side has a monopoly on suffering nor can either side fail to assume their commitments.

If neither party has executed the transaction, everything that was due by virtue of the transaction is subject to confiscation.

However, neither side was ready for a full scale war.

10.5. Until 31 December 2005 no Contracting Party

Neither side has been cooperative on this subject.

However, no decision has yet been taken on either side.14

So that's one of the negative side effects.

That'd one thing about duccedd

For the sake of the global economy, let us hope that neither side miscalculates.

No side has a yearning for war, which is why compromise solutions are possible.

Neither side will volunteer to bear the costs of recalibrating the relationship.

During the first two months of the siege, the situation was in balance.

Neither teaches the other apos s language in its schools.

Accordingly, decisions within the RCTS Council on any matter are considered to be adopted if none of the parties opposes such decisions.

Because the wording of the clause is so vague, it was impossible for either side to prove its point.

The artillery exchanged fire but none of the sides were willing to attack across the dale.

That is one side of the Asian picture.

Yet, for decades, neither the parties nor any of the many peace mediators have been able to claim the prize.

None of them.

If there are 15 operations, you know that none of them work.

Neither side in the debate about Americanization offers a convincing explanation for the phenomenon. Those who argue that Americanization is a virulent form of cultural imperialism'' apparently see it as a product of growing market domination by American media concerns.

Neither side in the debate about Americanization offers a convincing explanation for the phenomenon.

On 16 March, fighting continued with neither side having the upper hand in the battle or in full control of the town.

No one involved in standards implementation can afford to slow down now.

Sometimes one side rejects it sometimes the other.

Her comic and satirical side is one of her strengths.

Peace, prosperity and security in this tormented region can only be achieved if no party is excluded.

The talks being held now are an opportunity that neither side can afford to miss.

Although none of the parties involved might achieve their optimum goals, none would be wholly disappointed.

None of the cars are mine.

None of the rooms is ready.

None of the batteries work.

No technology will win.

In none of them do the conditions yet exist for an immediate leap from war to peace, nor do the parties themselves expect that to happen.

And that's part of what the National Institute for Play is all about.

So essentially, no matter what you flip it, it's going to be a heads.

So it's gonna be 2A times this side right over here